Schoeppel v. Pfannensteil
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court w|as delivered by
Dawson, J.:
This appeal presents the question whether the sale of an undivided half interest in a partnership stock of merchandise by one partner to his fellow partner is governed by the bulk-sales act. Briefly, the facts were these:
For some time prior to October 1, 1922, E. B. Hopper and Elias Pfannensteil, defendant herein, were partners engaged in merchandising and owned and operated a mercantile store in Ness City. On that date defendant purchased the undivided half interest of Hopper for $4,000 in cash. Neither partner made any effort to comply…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Daly v. Sumpter Drug Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- Cooney, Eckstein & Co. v. SweatSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- McAvoy v. JenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Marlow v. RingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
- Fairfield Shoe Co. v. OldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brinson v. Monroe Automobile & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Watkins v. AngusMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Faeth Co. v. BressieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Peterson Co. v. FreeburnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Citizens Trust Co. of Binghamton v. MerselisNew York Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.