Legal Opinion

Schoeppel v. Pfannensteil

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 12, 1927No. 27,091PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court w|as delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This appeal presents the question whether the sale of an undivided half interest in a partnership stock of merchandise by one partner to his fellow partner is governed by the bulk-sales act. Briefly, the facts were these:

For some time prior to October 1, 1922, E. B. Hopper and Elias Pfannensteil, defendant herein, were partners engaged in merchandising and owned and operated a mercantile store in Ness City. On that date defendant purchased the undivided half interest of Hopper for $4,000 in cash. Neither partner made any effort to comply…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Daly v. Sumpter Drug Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Cooney, Eckstein & Co. v. SweatSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. McAvoy v. JenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Marlow v. RingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Fairfield Shoe Co. v. OldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brinson v. Monroe Automobile & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  2. Watkins v. AngusMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Faeth Co. v. BressieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Peterson Co. v. FreeburnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Citizens Trust Co. of Binghamton v. MerselisNew York Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API