Peterson Co. v. Freeburn
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.
Four counts are declared upon in the petition. Three state separate causes of action on individual promissory notes signed and delivered September 10, 1925, by F. B. and Elizabeth Freeburn to appellant. These issues do n°t in any way involve appellee Frank Dubes, except in the manner and way alleged in Count 4. That is to say, the purpose of the last named-count is to invoke the benefits of Sections 10008 to 10012, inclusive, of the Code of 1924, known as the Bulk Sales Law. Predication of appellant’s case at this point is based upon the following facts: On September 10, 1925, F. B. Freeburn,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brown v. J. H. Bell Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- State ex rel. Shaver v. Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Chiesa & Co. v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Fairfield Shoe Co. v. OldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Taylor v. FoldsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Oyens Feed & Supply, Inc. v. PrimebankSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Faeth Co. v. BressieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Forman State Trust & Savings Bank v. WegmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Amended July 27, 2016 Oyens Feed & Supply, Inc. v. PrimebankSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016