Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Angus

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1928No. Docket No. 17PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWlEST, J.

The question: If a debtor, without compliance with the bulk sales law, sells a half interest in his business to another who becomes his partner, and later, and again without compliance with the bulk sales law, sells out to his partner, may his. creditors hold the purchaser in garnishment proceedings for the value of the merchandise received?

The answer: Yes.

The facts: Gaylord B. Angus conducted a retail coal business. In March, 1924, he was indebted to plaintiff, had about $500 worth of coal on hand, sold a half interest in the business and merchandise to defendant John W. Noor, and the seller…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Daly v. Sumpter Drug Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Musselman Grocer Co. v. Kidd, Dater & Price Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Spurr v. TravisMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Marlow v. RingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Fairfield Shoe Co. v. OldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Farrell v. PaulusMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Michigan Packing Co. v. MessarisMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. National Bank v. FrydlewiczMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Berger Furnace Co. v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Citizens Trust Co. of Binghamton v. MerselisNew York Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API