Velchoff v. Campbell
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
HOWELL, Justice.
Nick N. Velchoff, an oil and gas lease broker (“Broker”), appeals from a summary judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff, Edward Campbell (“Investor”). He urges this court to hold that summary judgment cannot be had on the strength of certain requests for admissions deemed admitted by operation of Rule 169 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. We disagree. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
In his original petition, Investor alleged that Broker was his agent and that they were associated in a joint venture to acquire mineral leases. It appears that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fitz-Gerald v. HullTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Teer v. DuddlestenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Schlipf v. Exxon Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
- Young v. HoddeTexas Supreme Court · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Walker v. Sharpe, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
- Flores v. H.E. Butt Stores, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
- State v. Carrillo, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994
- Cocke v. Meridian Savings Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
- Wenco of El Paso/Las Cruces, Inc. v. Nazario, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.