Legal Opinion

Hwang v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 19, 2010No. 09-246CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WHEELER, Judge.

Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Albert Hwang’s amended motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) and Defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(6), or in the alternative, motion for judgment on the administrative record. This military pay suit stems from Mr. Hwang’s separation from active duty service on March 24, 2004 as a Unit Supply Specialist with the United States Army (“Army”). On January 26, 2004, Mr. Hwang’s commander recommended that he undergo psychiatric treats ment after he complained to…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bussie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Stein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. O'Brien v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. Michael E. Stuart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. Walker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API