Legal Opinion
Walker v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 14, 2014No. 1:12-cv-00649PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
REDACTED OPINION
Pro Se Plaintiff; Motion to Dismiss; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Statute of Limitations; Incapacitation Pay.
OPINION
HORN, J.
Pro se plaintiff Kathryn Walker filed a complaint in the United States Court of Federal Claims alleging that she was wrongfully discharged from the United States Army Reserve on October 1, 2006, and that she was wrongfully denied incapacitation pay. Prior to when defendant responded to her complaint, Ms. Walker amended her complaint, and, thereafter, filed a second amended complaint. In her second amended complaint, Ms. Walker seeks…
2Cases cited114 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Perez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019