Legal Opinion
Martin v. Nager
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 5, 1983PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
192 N.J. Super. 189 (1983)
469 A.2d 519
ROSE & GARY MARTIN, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
GEORGE NORTON NAGER, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Camden County.
Decided August 5, 1983.
Michael J. Veneziani for plaintiffs (Joseph P. Briglia, attorney).
Arthur F. Risden for defendant (Archer & Greiner, attorneys).
DEIGHAN, J.S.C.
This controversy requires a determination of the ownership of an automobile and involves the interplay between the Motor Vehicle Certificate of Ownership Law (MVCOL), N.J.S.A. 39:10-1 et seq. and the Uniform Commercial Code-Sales (UCC), N.J.S.A. 12A:2-101 et seq. It…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- MERCHANTS IND. CORP., OF NY v. EgglestonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Phil Phillips Ford, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1971
- Rush v. SmithermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Al's Auto Sales v. MoskowitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Guy Martin Buick, Inc. v. Colorado Springs National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Verriest v. Ina Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Barco Auto Leasing Corp. v. HoltNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Sears Consumer Financial Corp. v. Thunderbird ProductsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Brasher's Cascade Auto Auction v. Valley Auto Sales & LeasingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Schultz v. Bank of the West, C.B.C.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.