Legal Opinion
Braham & Co. v. Steinard-Hannon Motor Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 17, 1929No. Appeal 111PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
This is a sheriff’s interpleader. The defendant having secured a judgment against Michael Pazzo, caused a writ of testatum fieri facias to be issued against him from the court of common pleas of Allegheny County, and by virtue thereof the sheriff of Lawrence County levied on an Oakland sedan automobile in his possession. H. L. Braham & Co., filed a property claim with the sheriff, alleging that the automobile belonged to it, and this issue was framed.
It is admitted that in April, 1927, the automobile in question belonged to J. B. Nielsen, and that he had obtained a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hennessy v. Automobile Owners' Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Carolina Discount Corp. v. Landis Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Goodman v. Anglo-California Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
- Littell v. Brayton Motor & Accessory Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1921
- Brenner v. PecarskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Semple v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HartmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Brown's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Majors v. MajorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Kaufmann & Baer v. Monroe Motor Line Transportation, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.