Legal Opinion
Crisman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 10, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAHERTY, Judge.
Richard Crisman (Claimant) petitions for review from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, which affirmed a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) granting the Modification Petition of Cytemp Specialty Steel (Employer). We affirm.
On May 7, 1993, Claimant sustained a work related neck and back injury while working as a mill hand for Employer. Claimant continued to perform his regular job duties until September 23, 1993, when Claimant ceased working and collected *768workers’ compensation benefits pursuant to a Notice of Compensation Payable.
On December 28,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- York Terrace/Beverly Enterprises v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Fiorentino v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- H.M. Stauffer & Sons, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- ANR Freight System v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cytemp Specialty Steel v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Crisman)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Brooks v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Philadelphia)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Channellock, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Crisman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- N. DiBlassio v. Therapeutic Center at Fox Chase Villa at Bridge (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023