Legal Opinion

Fiorentino v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 1990PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

Frank Fiorentino (claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that reversed the portion of a referee’s decision which awarded attorney’s fees to claimant pursuant to Section 440 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. § 996. 1 We reverse the Board solely on its denial of claimant’s attorney’s fees.

The facts of this case are as follows. At 10:00 a.m., on August 7, 1985, claimant, an iron worker, was on a job at the Philadelphia Zoo. Claimant was assigned the duty of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Fritz v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Tankin, Inc. v. WilliamsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Washington v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McGaffin v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Clark v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Trudnak v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Crisman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API