Legal Opinion
Wolfchild v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 21, 2010No. Nos. 03-2684L, 01-568LPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
This case arises under the Indian Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1505, and comes before the court for proceedings on remand from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit after that court’s decision on an interlocutory appeal of questions certified by this court. See Wolfchild v. United States, 559 F.3d 1228 (Fed.Cir.2009) (“Wolfchild VI”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2090, 176 L.Ed.2d 722, 755 (2010). The issues on *310remand are complex, reflecting both the convoluted and lengthy history of the federal government’s relationship with the group of Indians who are…
2Cases cited113 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Wolfchild v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Kingman Reef Atoll Investments L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Yakama Nation Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.