Legal Opinion

The Merchant of Tennis v. Super. Ct.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 2026No. E085766Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 1/14/26 See dissenting opinion. CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE MERCHANT OF TENNIS, INC., Petitioner, E085766 v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVDS2005614) THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN OPINION BERNARDINO COUNTY, Respondent; JESSICA GARCIA et al., Real Parties in Interest. ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for extraordinary writ. Tony Raphael, Judge. Petition granted. Arentfox Schiff and John S. Purcell for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. 1 Stiller Law Firm, Ariel J. Stiller-Shulman; Haines Law Group, Paul K.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Hedging Concepts, Inc. v. First Alliance Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Hogue v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API