Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Richmond Worsted Spinning Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 11, 1929PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBassett, J.

On appeal by an intervenor in proceedings in equity from the final .decree of the sitting Justice denying his right to relief.

The original bill was brought by James Simpson against Alexander H. Haddon and Edward L. Smeeton, who are non-residents and have never submitted themselves to the jurisdiction of this court, and the Richmond Worsted Spinning Company, a Maine corporation formed in December, 1923, by Haddon and Smeeton and located at Richmond.

Haddon and Smeeton had conveyed to the corporation mill property which Simpson claimed had been assets of a partnership to carry on a yarn spinning…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Keiswetter v. RubensteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Saunders v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Fletcher v. FletcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Jackson v. HooperNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
  5. O. K. Boiler & Welding Co. v. Minnetonka Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sample v. RomineMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  2. McRoberts v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Denny v. GuytonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. Rehnberg v. Minnesota Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Rosenthal v. RosenthalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API