Legal Opinion
O. K. Boiler & Welding Co. v. Minnetonka Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 14, 1924No. 13951PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
STEPHENSON, C.
It being the purpose of the officers of the O. K. Boiler & Welding Company to conduct the business of the company in the town of Henryetta, E. J. Baker entered into a contract with the Minnetonka Lumber Company for the purchase of building materials for the corporation. The lumber company sold and delivered the materials to the company in accordance with the agreement for the construction of the buildings. At the time of the purchase of the lumber a site had been selected on which to locate the buildings, but the title had not been taken. Later it was decided to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Coward v. ClantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Lind v. WebberNevada Supreme Court · 1913
- Irvine v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Tulsa Hospital Ass'n v. JubySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Senneff v. HealySupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Denny v. GuytonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Martin v. Chapel, Wilkinson, Riggs, and AbneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Standard Paving Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
- Oklahoma Company v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.