Legal Opinion
Rosenthal v. Rosenthal
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided May 25, 1988PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKUSICK, Chief Justice.
In the context of a family dispute arising out of the sale to other family members by plaintiff Theodore Rosenthal of his interests in the Rosenthal family businesses, we are called upon to address the scope and character of the fiduciary obligations that plaintiff contends were violated by his brother Robert Rosenthal and Robert’s wife Rona, the defendants in this case. 1 Pursuant to a special jury verdict the Superior Court (Kennebec County) entered judgment for plaintiff on certain of his claims and awarded him damages in the amount of $2,800,001. Because of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Ruth Panter v. Marshall Field & Co., Richard Weiss v. Marshall Field & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Owens v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pollitz v. . Wabash R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Harmon v. EmersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Bryan R. v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Henriksen v. CameronSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Hollis v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- LaPointe Ex Rel. Brown & LaPointe Development, Inc. v. Brown (In Re Brown)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1991
- Mueller v. ZimmerWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.