Legal Opinion
United States v. Sargent
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 4, 1908No. 2,699PublishedCited by 23 opinions
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
The United States by authority of Act Aug. 1, 1888, c. 728, 25 Stat. 357 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2516), instituted proceedings in the court below to condemn certain real es*82tate situate in Duluth, Minn., for a post-office site. Section 2 of the Act provides that:
“The practice, pleadings, forms and modes of proceeding in causes arising under the provisions of this act shall conform as near as may be to the practice, pleadings, forms and proceedings existing at the time in like cases of the courts of record of the state within which such Circuit or District Courts are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- United States Ex Rel. Angarica v. BayardSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Tillson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Mason City & Fort Dodge Railroad v. BoyntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Albert Hanson Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Metropolitan Water District v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Commercial Station Post Office, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.