Legal Opinion

Cornish v. Dickey

California Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1916No. L. A. No. 3595. Department TwoPublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is an action for injunction. Plaintiffs conduct a bakery business. For the increase of their trade and for the convenience of their customers they districted the city of Bakersfield, in which their business was conducted, into routes, and the business of each route was carried on in the following manner: Plaintiffs furnished the driver of the route with a delivery wagon bearing conspicuously the name “Cornish’s Bakery.” The driver supplied his own horse and harness. He called at the bakery each morning and placed in his wagon the daily supplies for the customers. At the end of the day he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Empire Steam Laundry v. LozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. In re Columbus Buggy Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. American Credit Indemnity Co. v. SacksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. New Method Laundry Co. v. MacCannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Pasadena Ice Co. v. ReederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Fulton Grand Laundry Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  5. Avocado Sales Co. v. WyseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API