Legal Opinion

Pianalto v. Pianalto

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 27, 2010No. CA 09-289PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Judge.

^Appellant Henry Pianalto appeals the November 25, 2008 order of the Washington County Circuit Court finding that certain percentages of the stock options granted to appellant by his employer, JB Hunt Transport, Inc. (JB Hunt), should be considered marital property and divided equally between the parties. Appellant contends that the stock options are not marital property, and appellee Patricia Pianalto cross-appeals, arguing that she should have been awarded half the stock options rather than the percentages awarded, and half the proceeds from appellant’s postdivorce…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Day v. DaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Helena-West Helena School District v. FlukerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. McDermott v. McDermottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Richardson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Poff v. PeedinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  2. Haley v. ElkinsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  3. L & L Energy Co. v. Chesapeake Exploration, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API