Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Richardson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 31, 1983No. 83-155PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
The Court of Appeals certified this divorce action to this Court because the case requires an interpretation of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 34-1214 (Supp. 1983). The appellant raises nine points of appeal and the cross-appellant raises three points. The major issue is whether an unexercised stock option is marital property. We hold that it is. The points of appeal are treated in the order raised.
The appellant contends that thirty acres acquired in her name during the marriage should be excluded from the classification of marital property because it was received as a gift. See…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Potter v. PotterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Warren v. WarrenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Riegler v. RieglerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Ford v. FordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Wiles v. WilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mark Scully v. Us Wats, Inc. Kevin O'hare, Individually and in His Capacity as President of Us Wats Aaron Brown, Individually and in His Capacity as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Us Wats Stephen Parker, Individually and in His Capacity as Executive Vice-President of Us WatsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Davidson v. DavidsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Bornemann v. BornemannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- In re the Marriage of HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.