Legal Opinion

MacKay v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 21, 1938No. A-9356PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, J.

The defendant was charged in the county court of Okfuskee county with the unlawful operation of a slot machine; was tried, convicted, and was by the court sentenced to pay a fine of $25 and costs, and has appealed.

This appeal is brought to this court for the purpose of determining whether or not the setting up and operating of an “Esco Novelty Candy Vending Machine, No. 382”, is a violation of the slot machine statute of this state. The statute in question, Oklahoma Statutes, 1931, section 2193, Okla. St. Ann., tit. 21, § 944, is as follows:

“Any person who sets up, operates or conducts, or…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. City of Moberly v. DeskinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Rankin v. Mills Novelty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. Harvie v. Heise, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  4. Painter v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Wilson v. McLaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Couch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Ex Parte DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Steely v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  4. Thamart v. MolineIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Prickett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API