Legal Opinion

Ponder v. State Ex Rel. Bruce

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 1940No. 29524PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This is a proceeding instituted by the state of Oklahoma, on the relation of the county attorney, to confiscate and forfeit an automobile. The plaintiff alleged that the car belonged to Douglas Ponder, and that the same was being used to violate the state’s prohibitory laws with his knowledge and consent. Douglas Ponder intervened, claiming ownership and denying he had knowledge of its unlawful use. From a judgment ordering the confiscation and forfeiture of the automobile, the inter-vener appeals.

At the trial, the plaintiff’s evidence disclosed only the following: That Frank Conway, who was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. State Ex Rel. CrowderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Riddle v. GarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Gmac v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moore v. BrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. 1942 Chevrolet Automobile No. BA 193397 v. State Ex Rel. ClineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Odom v. TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. One 1937 Dodge Coupe v. SpringerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. One 1937 Dodge Coupe v. SpringerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API