Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kirchhubel v. Munro

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1957No. Civ. 17193PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Appellants, owners of an on-sale liquor license at “Hilltop Lodge,” Daly City, were accused by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of violating sections 25601 (keeping a disorderly house) and 24200.5 (knowingly permitting illegal sale of narcotics), Business and Professions Code. At the hearing of the charges, the hearing officer found appellants guilty of both charges. The Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board held the evidence insufficient to support the finding under section 25601, but sufficient under section 24200.5 and as mandatorily required by that section revoked the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Covert v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State Board of Equalization v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Cooper v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Endo v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Ex parte HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Schaub's Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Brice v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Lacabanne Properties, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Reimel v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API