Ex parte Hayes
California Supreme Court
Hearing in the Supreme Court upon a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court
This is a proceeding upon habeas corpus, and the question involved is, whether it is competent for the board of supervisors of the city and county of San Francisco to provide by ordinance that it shall be unlawful to engage in the business of selling spirituous, malt or fermented liquors without a license, and at the same time to provide that no license shall be issued to any person for the purpose of engaging in the business of selling such liquors or wines in any dance-cellar or dance-hall, or in any place where females are permitted to wait or attend in any manner on any person,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Ex parte ChristensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sail'er Inn, Inc. v. KirbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Matter of Application of MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- William Hibbs, United States of America, Intervenor v. Department of Human Resources Charlotte Crawford Nikki FirpoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- In Re MakiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Mercurio v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.