Legal Opinion
State v. Riley
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 20, 1985No. 83-194PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The defendant, Arthur R. Riley, Jr., was convicted
in Superior Court (Souter, J.) on a charge of negligent homicide, RSA 630:3, II. On appeal, the defendant raises two issues for review: first, whether the results of his blood alcohol content test should have been excluded as the product of an unlawful arrest; and second, whether the process of drawing the blood for a blood analysis may be conclusively presumed valid under RSA 265:90 (1982) (since amended), where neither the defendant nor the State requests the production of the technician who drew the blood. We affirm.
On the evening of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. MayaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- State v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- State v. BrodeurSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- State v. BeauchesneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.