Legal Opinion
State v. Beauchesne
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 4, 2005No. 2004-011PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
Following a bench trial on stipulated facts, the defendant, John Beauchesne, was convicted of possession of cocaine, see RSA 318-B:2 (2004), possession of marijuana, see RSA 318-B:26 (2004), and resisting detention, see RSA 642:2 (1996). On appeal, he challenges his convictions for possession of cocaine and marijuana, arguing that the Superior Court (O’Neill, J.) erroneously denied his motion to suppress the cocaine and marijuana. The defendant does not challenge his conviction for resisting detention. We reverse and remand.
The trial court found the following facts. On September 27, 2002,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. PanarelloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. JoyceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. KelleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.