Legal Opinion

Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 5, 2024No. 1:23-cv-00318Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI JANE DOE, et al., : Case No. 1:23-cv-318 Plaintiffs, Judge Matthew W. McFarland v ARCHDIOCESE OF CINCINNATI, et al., Defendants. ORDER AND OPINION This matter is before the Court on Defendant Michael Asbeck’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 11). Plaintiffs filed a Response in Opposition to the Motion (Doc. 12), to which Defendant Michael Asbeck filed a Reply in Support (Doc. 13). Thus, this matter is ripe for the Court's review. For the reasons below, Defendant Michael Asbeck’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Fritz v. Charter Township of Com-StockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Denise Coley v. Lucas County, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API