Legal Opinion
Fritz v. Charter Township of Com-Stock
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 28, 2010No. 08-2578PublishedCited by 722 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal from the district court order granting in part Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs claims of retaliation for the exercise of her First Amendment rights and denying in part Defendant’s Motion as to Plaintiffs related state tort law claims but dismissing those claims without prejudice, Plaintiff, Sue Fritz, argues that the allegations in her complaint were sufficient to state a claim for retaliation under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons that follow, we REVERSE the district court’s order and REMAND for further proceedings…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by722 opinions
- Swanson v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Bridgett Handy-Clay v. City of Memphis, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Wurzelbacher v. Jones-KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Paterek v. Village of Armada, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
717 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.