Legal Opinion
Skogquist Trucking & Excavating Inc. v. Minnesota Workers' Compensation Assigned Risk Plan
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 17, 1995No. Civ. Nos. 3-94-1270, 3-94-1271Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiffs Skogquist Trucking and Excavating, Inc. (“Skogquist”), Darrell Nelson d/b/a D & N Trucking, Inc. (“D & N”), and Walters Rubbish, Inc. (“Walters”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) commenced these actions against Defendant Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Assigned Risk Plan (“ARP”) seeking, inter alia, a declaratory judgment that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), codified at 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, preempts Minnesota Statutes sections 176 and 79A and that they accordingly are not liable for insurance…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.