Ieppert v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MEYERS, Judge.
According to judgments entered in the trial court, appellant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault in four cases con*218solidated for prosecution. His punishment was assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for terms of 49, 40, 22, and 15 years. On appeal he claimed that these convictions were barred by the ex post facto clauses of the Texas and United States Constitutions because the statute under which he was prosecuted had not yet been enacted at the time of his allegedly criminal conduct. Tex. Const. art. I, § 16;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Studer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- American Plant Food Corporation v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by116 opinions
- Saldano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- in the Interest of E.M.N., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007
- In the Matter of C.O.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Sanchez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.