Studer v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MILLER, Judge.
This case presents us with our first opportunity to interpret the 1985 amendments to Art. 1.14, V.A.C.C.P., and Art. V, § 12, Tex.Const., concerning defects in charging instruments.
Appellant was charged by information with the misdemeanor offense of indecent exposure, alleged to have been committed on May 7, 1987. V.T.C.A. Penal Code § 21.08. He was found guilty in a bench trial, upon his plea of nolo contendere, and the trial judge assessed punishment at six months confinement in the county jail, probated. On direct appeal…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- American Plant Food Corporation v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Bynum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Helms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Brasfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by456 opinions
- Nix v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Duron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Teal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Ex Parte WeiseCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
451 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.