Legal Opinion

Agosta v. Astor

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 12, 2004No. D042200PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCONNELL, P. J.

The principal issue in this case is whether an employer who induces an employee to enter into an employment contract by intentionally promising compensation terms the employer never intended to honor may, as a matter of law, avoid tort liability for fraudulent inducement of contract because the contract contains an “at-will” provision that allows the employer to fire the employee at any time for any reason. The answer is, of course, no. Accordingly, we reverse, with directions, a judgment for defendants N. Arthur Astor, Astor Broadcast Group, North County Broadcasting…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Casa Herrera, Inc. v. BeydounCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Fox v. PollackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Rosenfeld v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
  2. Lane v. Vitek Real Estate Industries GroupDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  3. Champlaie v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
  4. Habitat Trust for Wildlife, Inc. v. City of Rancho CucamongaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Jadwin v. County of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API