Legal Opinion
United States v. Bey
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided August 20, 1954No. 4254PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:
At a rehearing, the accused was convicted of a violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 728. A board of review affirmed the conviction. We granted the accused’s petition for review to consider the sufficiency of the evidence and the legal correctness of the law officer’s instructions.
The specification of which the accused was found guilty alleges that, “being at the time Platoon Sergeant . . . [he] did . . . wrongfully and unlawfully receive from Private Richard Nelson, then a trainee-member of . . . [his battery],…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Holmgren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Wallace v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917
- State v. WappensteinWashington Supreme Court · 1912
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. ScolesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. StephenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
- United States v. WinbornUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. SchreiberUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. AllumsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.