State v. Cotton
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Gorman, Judge.
Following trial to a jury, defendant-appellant, Ricky Cotton, stands convicted of the rape, gross sexual imposition, and felonious sexual penetration of five adolescent female patients of the Millcreek Psychiatric Center for Children. Raising six assignments of error, Cotton alleges that (1) the trial court erred by admitting evidence of his alleged prior sexual misconduct, in violation of the Evidence Rules and the rape-shield statutes; (2) the trial court improperly limited cross-examination of a key complaining witness; (3) prosecutorial misconduct deprived him of a fair…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. LytleOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. BridgemanOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. SchaimOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. BroomOhio Supreme Court · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. KamlehOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. PowellOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. ThigpenOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. NetherlandOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. Walker, 87968 (7-26-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.