Legal Opinion
Cline v. H.E. Butt Grocery Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided December 23, 1999No. CivA G-99-293PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS AND COMPEL ARBITRATION
KENT, District Judge.
Plaintiff Cline brings suit against his former employer, HEB Grocery Company, alleging causes of action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (“ADEA”), the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”), and state law claims for breach of contract and negligence. Now before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED.
I. FACTUAL SUMMARY
Cline,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Webb v. Investacorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Susan M. ROSENBERG, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC. and John Wyllys, Defendants, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Miller Brewing Company v. Fort Worth Distributing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re H.E. Butt Grocery Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Smith v. H.E. Butt Grocery Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2000
- Quinn v. EMC Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2000
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Mapes v. Chevron USA Products Co. a Division of Chevron U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.