Legal Opinion

Noble v. Libby

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Winnebago county: Geo. W. BubNell, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTimliN, J.

It might be said of this case, “Confusion here hath found its masterpiece.” Erom the drafting of the complaint through the trial in the court below up to the final argument in this court such uncertainty exists that the counsel for plaintiff and respondent is unable to state the nature of the action, insisting that it may be an action for money had and received, an action at law to recover damages for breach of contract, or an action in equity; while the trial court at the opening of the trial first declared it an action in tort, after the trial had made considerable progress declared he did…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McKinnon v. VollmarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Page v. WellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Nelson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Norris v. CargillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Simmons v. PutnamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Forest County v. ShawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Knudson v. GeorgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Sicklesteel v. EdmondsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Lundin v. Ætna Ins. Co. of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API