Page v. Wells
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ionia. Assumpsit. The facts are in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.
The special count on which a recovery was had in this cause was as follows: The plaintiff complains “for that whereas, heretofore, to-wit, on or about the 1st day of May, A. D. 1872, the said defendant being then engaged in the business of selling the descriptions of wild land, which were subject to private entry and .sale by the *417United States, and also by the State of Michigan, upon the recommendations and representations of the said defendant as to the quantity and value of the lands which such descriptions represented, did on the day and date aforesaid, and at the city of Ionia in the said…
2Cited by36 opinions
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Howe v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Grabenheimer v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Sullivan v. HelbingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Fargo Gas & Coke Co. v. Fargo Gas & Electric Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.