Legal Opinion

URS Federal Services, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 30, 2011No. 11-790PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER

BRADEN, Judge.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS2

The proposed scope of Contract No. TEOAF-12-D-001 is for “nationwide services for the receipt, possession, custody, management, and disposition of seized, blocked, or forfeited personal property on behalf of [the Department of Treasury’s (“Treasury”) Executive Office for Asset Forfeiture], the agencies participating in [the Treasury Forfeiture Fund] or [Office of Foreign Assets Control] when the seizing or blocking agency determines that Contractor services for such property will be in the agency’s best interest.” AR 96.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Air Cargo Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. URS Federal Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  3. Safeguard Base Operations, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  4. Safeguard Base Operations, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  5. Stg LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API