Legal Opinion
URS Federal Services, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 18, 2012No. 11-790PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*675MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER DENYING THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
BRADEN, Judge.
On December 30, 2011, the court issued a Memorandum Opinion And Final Order ruling that a November 22, 2011 “Determination & Findings” made by the Department of Treasury (“Treasury”) to override a 100-day automatic stay, that became effective on November 14, 2011, when Plaintiff (“URS”) filed a bid protest with the General Accounting Office (“GAO”), was arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion. See URS Federal Servs., Inc. v. United States, 102 Fed.Cl. 664, 667-68 (2011). The relevant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Pgba, LLC v. United States, and Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Supreme Foodservice Gmbh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Dyncorp International LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- At & T Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Favor Techconsulting, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Comprehensive Health Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.