Legal Opinion

Ceja v. Rudolph & Sletten, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2013No. S193493PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

Section 377.60 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1 provides that a wrongful death action may be brought by a decedent’s “putative spouse” if he or she was dependent on the decedent. (§ 377.60, subd. (b).) The statute defines a putative spouse as “the surviving spouse of a void or voidable marriage who is found by the court to have believed in good faith that the marriage to the decedent was valid.” (Ibid. [italics added].) In question here is the meaning of the phrase in italics. Is the good faith inquiry a purely subjective one, or does the inquiry also require application of…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. LatimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. GiordanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Union of Med. Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Hamed v. HamedSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
  3. Poet, LLC v. State Air Res. Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Marriage of DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Der Weer v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API