Legal Opinion
City of Detroit v. Kresge
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1918No. Docket No. 143PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error to Wayne; Hally, J. Assumpsit by the city of Detroit against Sebastian S. Kresge for the amount of an assessment for taxes. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error. •
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
In this case it was stipulated as follows:
“Mr. Kresge is a resident of Detroit. The board of assessors in April, 1917, in making up the personal tax rolls, assessed him in the amount of $20,000. Subsequently the board of review increased his assessment to $3,000,000, after notice to him of their intention so to do. Mr. Kresge petitioned the board of review to reduce his proposed assessment of $3,000,000 to $5,429.18. * * * In his sworn statement Mr. Kresge, in answer to question Number 12, therein lists 66,548 shares of the common capital stock of the S. S. Kresge Company, of the par value of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bacon v. Board of State Tax CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co. v. Common Council of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Commonwealth By McElroy v. Walsh's TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Stroh v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Taggart v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Holmes v. BorgenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Shapero v. Department of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Voorhies v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Shapero v. Department of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1948