Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Borgen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 28, 1937No. 31,147PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
Action for declaratory judgment. Each party moved for judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiffs’ motion was denied and defendant’s granted. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment.
The pleadings disclose that Newell F. Russell died testate January 25, 1935, a resident of St. Louis county, this state, and that plaintiffs are the duly qualified executors of his will. Borgen, the defendant, is the county auditor of St. Louis county, this state. When Russell died and prior to 1929 he Avas and had been the OAvner of 2,303 shares of the common stock of Bridgeman-Russell Company, a corporation…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rogers v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- State v. St. Paul Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Dupuy v. JohnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma County v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Board of County Commissioners v. Citizens' National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DixsonMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Mankato Citizens Telephone Co. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- In Re Estate of AbbottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- State v. DancerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Mankato Citizens Telephone Co. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966