Legal Opinion

Shapero v. Department of Revenue

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1948No. Docket No. 13, Calendar No. 43,999PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the circuit court upholding the validity of the intangible tax on the shares of stock held by plaintiffs in Michigan corporations should be affirmed. There is no question but that if an ad valorem tax had been levied against such stock, it would have resulted in double taxation under the authority ofStroh v. City of Detroit, 131 Mich. 109, City of Detroit v.Kresge, 200 Mich. 668, and other cases cited by Mr. Justice CARR in the foregoing opinion.

Act No. 301, Pub. Acts 1939, as amended by Act No. 233, Pub. Acts 1941, and Act No. 165, Pub. Acts 1945 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1945, §…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. C. F. Smith Co. v. FitzgeraldMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Shivel v. Kent County TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Stroh v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Taggart v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. City of Detroit v. KresgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stockler v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Davis v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Goodenough v. Department of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Rosenbalm v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Stockler v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API