Legal Opinion

People v. Hilliard

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1963No. Crim. 4275PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

Appellant, Raymond Hilliard, was charged by information with possession of a deadly weapon by an ex-felon in violation of section 12021 of the Penal Code and three prior convictions. Appellant admitted the three prior felony convictions. On this appeal from the judgment rendered on the jury verdict finding him guilty as charged, he contends that the evidence on which the conviction is based was erroneously admitted as it was the result of an unlawful search and seizure and that his alleged confession was likewise erroneously admitted. There is no merit in either of these contentions.

Viewing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. People v. MickelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. BlodgettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. GaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. SipeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. People v. CurrierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. People v. MacHelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. People v. NietoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. People v. NietoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API