Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. MacHel

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1965No. 4539PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

234 Cal.App.2d 37 (1965)

44 Cal. Rptr. 126

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

PETER MACHEL, Defendant and Appellant.

Docket No. 4539.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

April 29, 1965.

James C. Purcell for Defendant and Appellant.

Stanley Mosk and Thomas C. Lynch, Attorneys General, Edward P. O'Brien, John F. Kraetzer, Robert R. Granucci and Clifton R. Jeffers, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

SULLIVAN, P.J.

The court sitting without a jury found defendant guilty of possession of marijuana. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11530.)[1] He appeals from the…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. MickelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. ManisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. People v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. People v. BeasleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. BeasleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. People v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API