Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Goulette

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 4, 1929No. 523PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFunderburk, J.

J. D. Goulette recovered judgment in the trial court against D. B. Thomas for $787.50. Defendant has appealed. By the suit damages were claimed for injuries to an automobile and for personal injuries to-the plaintiff, resulting from a collision of cars drivén by the respective parties upon a public highway.

By his first proposition appellant insists that the trial court erred in failing to define the term, “new independent cause,” i used in the court’s definition of “proximate cause,” given in connection with special issues submitted to the jury. Appellee contends, among other things, that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robertson & Mueller v. HoldenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. ZumwaltTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  3. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Thompson v. FieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Afflerbach v. Yorktown Independent School Dist.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Southland Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. CottenTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MercerTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Wilson v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Plains Transport, Inc. v. IsaacsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API