Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Mercer

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1936No. 6513PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Railway Company and Mercer each filed an application for a writ of error and each application was granted, from which it results that in this court each party is both plaintiff in error and defendant in error. For convenience we shall designate Mercer as plaintiff and the Railway Company as defendant.

We glean the following facts from the full statement made by the Honorable Court of Civil Appeals:

Plaintiff is the owner of a tract of land located 5 or 6 miles northeast of the City of Sherman, on which he had operated a dairy and truck farm for many years prior to the origin of the cause of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BighamTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Seale. v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Robertson & Mueller v. HoldenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. Ewing, Ind. Exs. v. Wm. L. Foley, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Greer v. ThamanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Ingram v. DeereTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. LEVENE ET UX. v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. St. Paul Surplus Lines Ins. Co., Inc. v. Dal-Worth Tank, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996
  4. Taormina v. CulicchiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  5. Howell v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API