State v. Pennington
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KAREN KING MITCHELL, Presiding Judge.
The State appeals from the circuit court’s interlocutory order suppressing oral and written statements made by Douglas Pennington during a police interview. The State argues that the circuit court applied an incorrect legal standard in requiring the State to demonstrate an express waiver of Pennington’s rights to remain silent and have counsel present during questioning. In Berghuis v. Thompkins, 560 U.S. 370, 130 S.Ct. 2250, 2261, 176 L.Ed.2d 1098 (2010), the United States Supreme Court held that express waivers are not required in order to demonstrate…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. NormanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. JAMES CARL DUKE IIIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- State of Missouri v. Joshua WatkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
- State of Missouri v. Teddy Charles HammerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- State of Missouri v. Terrance Teron NormanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014