STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. JAMES CARL DUKE III
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMary W. Sheffield, J.
James C. Duke (“Defendant”) appeals from his convictions after a bench trial for first-degree murder and armed criminal action. See §§ 565.020, 571.015, RSMo (2000). Defendant presents three points on appeal: (1) the trial court clearly erred in admitting Defendant’s confession into evidence; (2) the trial court abused its discretion in allowing a detective to testify he found no evidence of self-defense; and (3) the trial court plainly erred in permitting the prosecutor to discuss case law during closing argument. These arguments are without merit, and we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Fac…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- State v. EdwardsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. WrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Duke v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- CHRIS COURTOIS, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024