Union Stove & Machine Works v. Caswell
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Reno District Court. Action by Smedley Darlington against John D. Caswell, Sarah J. Caswell, his wife, and the Union Stove & Machine Works, on a note and real-estate mortgage. The defendant company claimed a judgment lien on the mortgaged lands. On the latter claim there was a verdict and judgment for the Caswells, and the defendant company brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was originally an ordinary action upon a promissory note and a real-estate mortgage, brought in the district court of Harvey county by Smedley Darlington, the payee and mortgagee, against John D. Caswell and Sarah J. Caswell, husband and wife, the payers and mortgagors, to recover the sum of $866.50 and interest. The plaintiff also made the Union Stove & Machine Works, a corporation of Leavenworth, Kas., a party defendant. As the plaintiff’s claim seems to have been admitted by all the parties, and no claim of error is assigned as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Calvo v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- George v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
- Plano Manufacturing Co. v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Boardman v. LarrabeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
- Kane v. . CortesyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Likins-Foster Honolulu Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. BassIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- First National Bank v. LivermoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- SEC. Nat. Bank of Kansas City v. Continental Ins.District Court, D. Kansas · 1982
- Fisher v. SpillmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.