Griffith v. Stucker
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Franklin district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
The city of Ottawa undertook to improve several of its streets. To that end contracts were let to N. E. Stucker. Stucker sublet a portion *49of the work to Lightfoot Brothers, who failed before performance. The action was brought by W. E. Griffith, who is the assignee of laborers and material-men having claims against Lightfoot Brothers. The defendants are the obligors in a bond given by Stueker to the state of Kansas, and the surety in a bond given by Lightfoot Brothers to Stueker. The defendants recovered and the plaintiff appeals.
Chapter 179…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anthony v. HermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Plano Manufacturing Co. v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Board of Commissioners v. Snodgrass & Young Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- Stewart v. RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Pneucrete Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- United States v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Algonite Stone Manufacturing Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Goeken v. Bank of PalmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Union Traction Co. v. Standard Brick Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.